MetaMUI Classical Suite
Blockchain-optimized algorithms for current deployment
The MetaMUI Classical Suite represents our current recommended algorithms, extending DJB’s foundational work with blockchain-specific optimizations.
Core Algorithms
AEAD: ChaCha20-Poly1305
Pure DJB design representing the pinnacle of AEAD performance
- Design Origin: Direct implementation of Daniel J. Bernstein’s AEAD construction
- Performance: ~1,200 MB/s software performance without hardware dependencies
- Use Cases: TLS 1.3, mobile applications, universal deployment
- Security: 256-bit keys provide ~128-bit post-quantum security
- Advantage: Software-optimized for consistent performance across all platforms
Key Exchange: X25519
DJB ecosystem consistency and software optimization
- Design Origin: Bernstein’s Curve25519 Diffie-Hellman
- Performance: 2-3x faster than traditional ECDH in software
- Use Cases: Key agreement, forward secrecy protocols
- Security: 128-bit classical, ~64-bit post-quantum security
- Advantage: Constant-time implementation, immunity to many side-channel attacks
Signatures: Sr25519
Blockchain batch verification extension of DJB principles
- Design Origin: Extension of Ed25519 with Ristretto group and batch verification
- Performance: Exceptional batch verification capabilities for blockchain consensus
- Use Cases: Blockchain transactions, batch signature verification, Substrate-based networks
- Security: 128-bit classical security level
- Advantage: Optimized for blockchain infrastructure throughput
Hashing: Blake3
Parallel performance champion aligned with DJB philosophy
- Design Origin: Evolution of Blake2 with extreme parallelization
- Performance: 2-4x faster than SHA-256 on modern multi-core CPUs
- Use Cases: Merkle trees, content addressing, high-throughput hashing
- Security: 256-bit output, collision-resistant
- Advantage: Parallel processing and streaming capabilities
Performance Characteristics
Throughput Comparison (MB/s on modern CPU)
| Algorithm | MetaMUI Classical | Traditional Alternative | Performance Gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEAD | ChaCha20-Poly1305: ~1,200 | AES-GCM: ~800 (software) | 1.5x software |
| Key Exchange | X25519: ~50k ops/sec | ECDH P-256: ~20k ops/sec | 2.5x operations |
| Signatures | Sr25519: ~15k batch/sec | Ed25519: ~8k individual/sec | ~2x throughput |
| Hashing | Blake3: ~2,000 | SHA-256: ~800 | 2.5x parallel |
Memory Efficiency
| Algorithm | State Size | Memory Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 | ~200 bytes | Minimal state, cache-friendly |
| X25519 | ~64 bytes | Compact key representation |
| Sr25519 | ~64 bytes | Same as Ed25519, batch benefits |
| Blake3 | ~54 bytes | Smaller than SHA-256 state |
Blockchain Optimization Features
Transaction Processing
- Sr25519: Batch verification reduces validation time by ~60%
- Blake3: Parallel Merkle tree construction for faster block building
- ChaCha20-Poly1305: Efficient encrypted communication between nodes
Mobile Wallet Performance
- X25519: Fast key agreement for wallet-to-wallet communication
- ChaCha20-Poly1305: Battery-efficient encryption for mobile devices
- Blake3: Quick address generation and transaction hashing
Network Protocol Efficiency
- All algorithms: Software-optimized for consistent performance across diverse hardware
- Reduced dependencies: No hardware acceleration requirements
- Universal deployment: Same performance characteristics across platforms
Integration Examples
Basic Usage Pattern
from metamui_crypto import ClassicalSuite
# Initialize the classical suite
suite = ClassicalSuite()
# Key exchange
shared_secret = suite.key_exchange.x25519(private_key, public_key)
# Message encryption
ciphertext, tag = suite.aead.chacha20_poly1305_encrypt(
plaintext, nonce, shared_secret
)
# Digital signature
signature = suite.signatures.sr25519_sign(message, signing_key)
# Hashing
hash_value = suite.hashing.blake3(data)
Blockchain Transaction Example
# High-performance transaction processing
signatures = [sr25519_sign(tx, key) for tx, key in transactions]
valid = suite.signatures.sr25519_batch_verify(signatures, transactions, public_keys)
# Parallel block hash computation
block_hash = suite.hashing.blake3_parallel(block_data, num_threads=8)
Security Properties
Classical Security Levels
- ChaCha20-Poly1305: 256-bit security against classical attacks
- X25519: 128-bit security level (equivalent to 3072-bit RSA)
- Sr25519: 128-bit security level with batch verification integrity
- Blake3: 256-bit collision resistance, 128-bit preimage resistance
Side-Channel Resistance
- Constant-time implementations: All algorithms resist timing attacks
- Memory access patterns: Uniform memory access to prevent cache attacks
- Branch prediction: No secret-dependent branching in critical paths
Use Case Recommendations
High-Performance Blockchain Networks
Primary Choice: Full classical suite
- Sr25519 for consensus signatures
- Blake3 for block and transaction hashing
- X25519 for peer-to-peer key exchange
- ChaCha20-Poly1305 for network encryption
Mobile Wallet Applications
Primary Choice: Classical suite with battery optimization
- ChaCha20-Poly1305 for message encryption (battery efficient)
- X25519 for key derivation (fast on mobile CPUs)
- Blake3 for address generation (parallel utilization)
- Sr25519 for transaction signing (when batch verification available)
Enterprise Integration
Primary Choice: Classical suite for gradual adoption
- Proven algorithms with extensive analysis
- Software performance without hardware requirements
- Clear migration path to post-quantum when needed
Migration Timeline
Current (2024-2025)
- Full classical suite deployment for maximum performance
- Hybrid testing with post-quantum algorithms in development environments
- Infrastructure preparation for future PQC migration
Transition (2025-2030)
- Gradual introduction of post-quantum algorithms alongside classical
- Hybrid mode operations maintaining backward compatibility
- Performance monitoring to optimize transition timing
Post-Quantum (2030+)
- Migration to PQC suite as quantum computing threat materializes
- Maintained API compatibility ensuring smooth application updates
- Performance optimization of post-quantum implementations
Related Documentation
- Post-Quantum Suite - Future-ready quantum-resistant algorithms
- Performance Analysis - Detailed benchmarks and comparisons
- Migration Guide - Classical to post-quantum transition
- DJB Heritage - Historical context and principles